For software, SaaS, IT services and e-commerce teams, manage the sales funnel, demo requests and support processes. Scale growth with automations and reports.
The modules that matter most for your industry work right out of the box.
Pipelines, kanban, scoring, saved views
Stages, products, revenue & win rate
Assignments, notifications, full history
Sequences, campaigns, web forms
Pivot reports, funnel, team performance
CRUD permissions, department hierarchy
A technology company sells twice: once to win the contract, and every month afterwards to keep it. Leads arrive from a trial sign-up, a demo request or a partner referral; the deal runs trial → demo → proposal → won over weeks; and the day it closes, the same customer becomes a stream of support tickets whose handling decides whether the subscription renews. So the setup for a software house, SaaS startup, IT services firm or integrator centres on one pipeline whose stages are events, deals valued in monthly recurring terms, a ticketing module that keeps support on the same customer record as sales, automations that chase idle trials and route tickets, roles that separate sales, support and engineering, and reports that show pipeline and ticket load side by side. It is a CRM and a customer-support desk; it is not a project tracker for engineering or a billing engine.
A software company's enquiry is rarely a phone call. It is a trial account created at 23:10 by someone with a company e-mail address who has also signed up to two competitors, a "book a demo" form filled in from a comparison article, or a message from a partner who met a prospect at an event. The person is technical enough to evaluate alone and busy enough to forget by Thursday. Whoever replies first with something useful — a working answer, a demo slot, a relevant example — gets the second conversation; the others get a trial that quietly expires.
The evidence on speed is old and blunt: the Harvard Business Review study of 2,241 companies found that responding within an hour made a lead nearly seven times as likely to be qualified as waiting even one hour more, and that the average response time was 42 hours. Technology companies are not slower than average; they are simply the ones where the founder is still doing sales between two deploys.
The second shape is the second sale. In a subscription or maintenance business, winning the deal is the start of the revenue, not the end. The customer who opened four tickets in the first month and got three of them answered late does not renew, and no pipeline report will show why, because the pipeline stopped watching at "won". Support and sales need to be on one record.
Every stage is something that verifiably happened. "Interested" and "warm" are not stages; a trial created and a demo attended are.
| Stage | Verifiable event | Automation that usually helps |
|---|---|---|
| New lead | Trial created, form submitted or webhook received | Assign owner in turn; welcome message in the lead's language |
| Contacted | A human replied or called | No reply in 2 days → second message; in 5 days → task |
| Demo booked | Appointment exists with date and presenter | Reminder 24 h and 1 h before |
| Demo done | Appointment marked attended | Task: send recap and proposal within 1 working day |
| Proposal sent | Deal created with products and value | Follow-up at 3 and 7 days; notify manager above a value |
| Negotiation | Counter-proposal or procurement questions recorded | Idle 10 days → alert owner and manager |
| Won / Lost | Signed order, or explicit refusal | Won → onboarding task list and ticket queue assignment; lost reason required |
For an IT services firm or integrator, the shape is the same with two differences: "scoping call" replaces "demo", and "proposal sent" carries a project estimate rather than a subscription price. Give product sales and services sales separate pipelines if you do both; Starter includes two pipelines, Growth five, Business ten.
| Field | Type | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Product / plan of interest | List | Routes to the right specialist; report dimension |
| Seats or users | Number | Sizes the deal before a proposal exists |
| Monthly value | Number | Recurring value as the deal amount; annual is a report multiplication |
| Current tool | List | Competitor or spreadsheet; predicts migration effort and objections |
| Trial start / trial end | Date | Date-based automations: day-3 check-in, day-12 expiry warning |
| Technical contact | Text | Often not the buyer; needed at onboarding and on tickets |
| Country / language | System fields | Filled from the phone country code; decides who answers and in which language |
| Ad campaign / ad set / ad | System fields | Filled by the lead webhook; tells you which campaign produced demos, not just sign-ups |
| Lost reason | List, required on Lost | Price, missing feature, chose competitor, no decision — the only way to learn |
The lead-detail layout is configurable per role, so a sales rep sees value and trial fields, a support agent sees the technical contact and open tickets, and neither scrolls through forty inputs. Products carry their own custom fields too — plan tier, billing period, included seats — so a proposal is built from the catalogue rather than typed.
A trial that nobody from your side has touched by day three is, statistically, already lost. The lead webhook accepts a plain HTTP request from your own application, so a new trial account creates a lead the moment it is registered, with the plan, the sign-up source and the campaign fields attached. From there the work is scheduling, not remembering.
The response-time report measures the first reply in working minutes according to the shift calendar, so the 23:10 sign-up answered at 09:05 counts as five minutes, not ten hours, and the rep who consistently answers in forty is visible next to the one who answers in four.
The ticketing module is your customers' support desk inside the CRM: a customer raises a ticket by e-mail or through the form, or your team opens one from a WhatsApp conversation, and it lives on the same customer record as the deal that won them. Tickets have a status, a priority, an assignee and a message thread; assignment sends a notification; and a manager sees the queue by person and by age.
Three things make it work for a technology company rather than merely exist:
It is worth being precise about what this is not: there are no contractual SLA timers or breach escalation chains. There are priorities, ages, assignment rules and reports, which is what most teams under fifty people actually use.
Automations are rules with a trigger and one or more actions. Stage-level rules fire when a lead enters a stage; system-wide rules watch dates, idle time and incoming messages. The catalogue includes assigning an owner, sending a message or e-mail, creating a task, changing a field, adding a tag and moving a stage, and every run is logged with its outcome.
| Trigger | Action | What it prevents |
|---|---|---|
| New lead from webhook | Assign in turn; welcome message; task "call within 4 h" | The 42-hour average |
| Trial start + 3 days | Task for owner: check activity | Trials nobody touched |
| Enters "Demo done" | Task: proposal within 1 working day | Demos that never become proposals |
| Idle 10 days in "Proposal sent" | Message to prospect; alert owner and manager | Deals dying quietly |
| Deal won | Create onboarding task list; tag "customer"; notify support lead | The silent first week after signing |
| Ticket unassigned 30 minutes | Assign to support in turn; notify | Tickets waiting for a volunteer |
Roles decide which modules a person may use and what they may do in them — view, create, edit, delete, export — per entity. Data scope decides whose records they see: their own, their department's, or everyone's. Departments form an org chart; a manager sees what their department sees.
The activity log records who viewed, changed, reassigned or exported which record — which is the answer when a customer asks who had access to their data, and a reasonable thing to have before a security questionnaire asks.
An integrator or IT services firm sells a project, not a plan. The pipeline ends at "won", and the work begins: a task list with owners and dates, milestones, hours and costs. On the Business plan a won deal can open a project with its tasks, and the deal's income and expenses show its profitability — the estimate against what it actually cost in people and licences.
All of these come from the pivot report builder on Growth and above: rows, columns, a measure and a filter, saved and exported to CSV.
This is not an engineering issue tracker: there are no sprints, repositories, releases or integrations with development tools. Tickets are customer conversations with a status and an owner; the bug behind a ticket belongs in your engineering tool, and the ticket carries its reference as a field.
It is not a subscription billing engine: it records deal value, income, expenses and commissions, but it does not charge cards, generate recurring invoices or handle dunning. And automated daily backups of your workspace are not currently part of the service; export what you must retain.
| Symptom | Most likely cause | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Trials expire untouched | Sign-ups not reaching the CRM, or no owner | Point the application at the lead webhook; set distribution on the source |
| Same company as three leads | Three colleagues signed up separately | Duplicate report on phone and e-mail; merge; company field as a report dimension |
| Proposals dying quietly | No idle rule on the proposal stage | Idle 10 days → alert; follow-up tasks at 3 and 7 days |
| Tickets answered by whoever notices | No assignment rule | Automation: unassigned 30 min → assign in turn and notify |
| Engineers see the whole pipeline | Given administrator instead of a role | Engineer role: tickets only, customer read-only |
| Campaign reports show sign-ups, sales shows none | Ad fields empty on webhook leads | Send campaign, ad set and ad in the webhook; they are system fields |
| Renewal surprised by churn | Support and sales on separate tools | Tickets on the customer record; tickets-by-customer report monthly |
| Module | Starter | Growth | Business |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leads, deals, 2 / 5 / 10 pipelines, custom fields, saved views | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Lead webhook from your own application, web forms | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Demo appointments with reminders | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Products with plans, seats and cost prices | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Ticketing (customer support desk) | — | Yes | Yes |
| Automations (trial chasing, idle alerts, ticket routing) | — | Yes | Yes |
| Full roles, departments, activity log | — | Yes | Yes |
| Pivot reports (pipeline by source, tickets by customer) | — | Yes | Yes |
| Projects after the deal, deal profitability | — | — | Yes |
| API access, SSO, white-label | — | — | Enterprise |
A two-founder startup doing its own sales runs on Starter. A company with a support team, more than a handful of trials a week and engineers who should see only tickets lands on Growth — for ticketing, automations and roles more than anything else. Services firms that need projects and margin per engagement go to Business. See the pricing page, and the ticketing and automation pages for the two modules that carry the load.
Set up your workspace in under a minute — free for 14 days.
Create your workspace